Користувач:MonAx/Чернетка
The Altaic proposal, grouping Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic, emerged in the 19th century as a residue when the larger Ural–Altaic grouping was abandoned.[1] Korean was added to the proposal by Gustaf Ramstedt in 1924, and others later added Japanese.[1] The languages share features such as agglutinative morphology, subject–object–verb order and postpositions.[2][3] Many cognates have been proposed, and attempts have been made to reconstruct a proto-language.[3][4]
The Altaic theory was incorporated into the influential two-wave migration model of Korean ethnic history proposed in the 1970s by the archaeologist Kim Won-yong, who attributed cultural transitions in prehistoric Korea to migrations of distinct ethnic groups from the north.[5][6][7] The appearance of Neolithic Jeulmun pottery was interpreted as a migration of a Paleosiberian group, while the arrival of bronze was attributed to a Tungusic migration of the ancestral Korean population, identified with the Yemaek of later Chinese sources.[8][9] South Korean culture-historians tended to project contemporary Korean homogeneity into the distant past, assuming that a preformed Korean people arrived in the peninsula from elsewhere, ignoring the possibility of local evolution and interaction.[10][11] However, no evidence of these migrations has been found, and archaeologists now believe that the Korean peninsula and adjacent areas of eastern Manchuria have been continuously occupied since the Late Pleistocene.[7][10] The projection of the Yemaek back to this period has also been criticized as unjustified.[10][11]
Moreover, most comparativists no longer accept the core Altaic family itself, even without Korean, believing most of the commonalities to be the result of prolonged contact.[2][12] The shared features turned out to be rather common among languages across the world, and typology is no longer considered evidence of a genetic relationship.[1] While many cognates are found between adjacent groups, few are attested across all three. The proposed sound correspondences have also been criticized for invoking too many phonemes, such as the four phonemes that are said to have merged as *y in proto-Turkic.[1] Similarly, Koreanic *r is said to result from the merger of four proto-Altaic liquids.[4]
In any case, most of the proposed matches with Korean were from the neighbouring Tungusic group.[4] A detailed comparison of Korean and Tungusic was published by Kim Dongso in 1981, but it has been criticized for teleological reconstructions, failing to distinguish loanwords and poor semantic matches, leaving too few comparisons to establish correspondences.[13] Much of this work relies on comparisons with modern languages, particularly Manchu, rather than reconstructed proto-Tungusic.[12] Many of the best matches are found only in Manchu and closely related languages, and thus could be the result of language contact.[14]
Scholars outside of Korea have given greater attention to possible links with Japonic, which were first investigated by William George Aston in 1879.[4] The phoneme inventories of the two proto-languages are similar, with a single series of obstruents, a single liquid consonant and six or seven vowels.[15] Samuel Martin, John Whitman and others have proposed hundreds of possible cognates, with sound correspondences.[16][3] Most of the shared words concern the natural environment and agriculture.[17][18]
However, Koreanic and Japonic have a long history of interaction, which may explain their grammatical similarities and makes it difficult to distinguish inherited cognates from ancient loanwords.[19][20] Most linguists studying the Japonic family believe that it was brought to the Japanese archipelago from the Korean peninsula around 700–300 BC by wet-rice farmers of the Yayoi culture.[21][16] Placename glosses in the Samguk sagi and other evidence suggest that Japonic languages persisted in central and southwestern parts of the peninsula into the early centuries of the common era.[18]
The early Japanese state received many cultural innovations via Korea, which may also have influenced the language.[20] Alexander Vovin points out that Old Japanese contains several pairs of words of similar meaning in which one word matches a Korean form, while the other is also found in Ryukyuan and Eastern Old Japanese.[19] He suggests that the former group represent early loans from Korean, and that Old Japanese morphemes should not be assigned a Japonic origin unless they are also attested in Southern Ryukyuan or Eastern Old Japanese, which reduces the proposed cognates to fewer than a dozen.[19]
A link with Dravidian was first proposed by Homer Hulbert in 1905 and explored by Morgan Clippinger in 1984, but has attracted little interest since the 1980s.[3][4] There have also been proposals to link Korean with Austronesian, but these have few adherents.[3][8]
All modern varieties are descended from the language of Unified Silla.[3][4] Evidence for the earlier linguistic history of the Korean peninsula is extremely sparse. Various proposals have been based on archaeological and ethnological theories and vague references in early Chinese histories.[3] There is a tendency in Korea to assume that all languages formerly spoken on the peninsula were early forms of Korean, but the evidence indicates much greater linguistic variety in the past.[4]
Chinese histories provide the only contemporaneous descriptions of peoples of the Korean peninsula and eastern Manchuria in the early centuries of the common era.[4] They contain impressionistic remarks about the customs and languages of the area based on second-hand reports, and sometimes contradict one another.[4] The later Korean histories lack any discussion of languages.[4]
In 108 BC, the Chinese Han dynasty conquered northern Korea and established the Four Commanderies of Han, the most important being Lelang, which was centred on the basin of the Taedong River and lasted until 314 AD.[23] Chapter 30 of the Records of the Three Kingdoms[a] (late 3rd century) and Chapter 85 of the Book of the Later Han (5th century) contain parallel accounts of peoples neighbouring the commanderies, apparently both based on a survey carried out by the Chinese state of Wei after their defeat of Goguryeo in 244.[24][4][23]
To the north and east, the Buyeo, Goguryeo and Ye were described as speaking similar languages, with the language of Okjeo only slightly different from them.[4] Their languages were said to differ from that of the Yilou to the northeast. The latter language is completely unattested, but is believed, on the basis of the description of the people and their location, to have been Tungusic.[4]
To the south lay the Samhan ('three Han'), Mahan, Byeonhan and Jinhan, who were described in quite different terms from Buyeo and Goguryeo.[4][b] The Mahan were said to have a different language from Jinhan, but the two accounts differ on the relationship between the languages of Byeonhan and Jinhan, with the Records of the Three Kingdoms describing them as similar, but the Book of the Later Han referring to differences.[4] The Zhōuhú (州胡) people on a large island to the west of Mahan (possibly Jeju) were described as speaking a different language to Mahan.[24][23]
Based on this text, Lee Ki-Moon divided the languages spoken on the Korean peninsula at that time into Puyŏ and Han groups.[4] Lee originally proposed that these were two branches of a Koreanic language family, a view that was widely adopted by scholars in Korea.[8][12][5] He later argued that the Puyŏ languages were intermediate between Korean and Japanese.[4] Alexander Vovin and James Marshall Unger argue that the Han languages were Japonic, and were replaced by Koreanic Puyŏ languages in the 4th century.[26][27] Some authors believe that the Puyŏ languages belong to the Tungusic family.[3][28] Others believe that there is insufficient evidence to support a classification.[29]
As Chinese power ebbed in the early 4th century, centralized states arose on the peninsula.[23] The Lelang commandery was overrun by Goguryeo in 314. In the south, Baekje, the Gaya confederacy and Silla arose from Mahan, Byeonhan and Jinhan respectively.[11][23][c] Thus began the Three Kingdoms period, referring to Goguryeo, Baekje and Silla (Gaya was absorbed by Silla in the 6th century). The period ended in the late 7th century, when Silla conquered the other kingdoms in alliance with the Chinese Tang dynasty and then expelled the Tang from the peninsula.[23]
Linguistic evidence from these states is sparse and, being recorded in Chinese characters, difficult to interpret. Most of these materials come from Silla, whose language is generally believed to be ancestral to all extant Korean varieties.[6] There is no agreement on the relationship of Sillan to the languages of the other kingdoms. The issue is politically charged in Korea, with scholars who point out differences being accused by nationalists of trying to "divide the homeland".[6] Apart from placenames, whose interpretation is controversial, data on the languages of Goguryeo and Baekje is extremely sparse.[31]
The most widely cited evidence for Goguryeo is chapter 37 of the Samguk sagi, a history of the Three Kingdoms period written in Classical Chinese and compiled in 1145 from earlier records that are no longer extant.[4] This chapter surveys the part of Goguryeo annexed by Silla, listing pronunciations and meanings of placenames, from which a vocabulary of 80 to 100 words has been extracted.[4] Although the pronunciations recorded using Chinese characters are difficult to interpret, some of these words appear to resemble Tungusic, Korean or Japonic words.[4][32] Scholars who take these words as representing the language of Goguryeo have come to a range of conclusions about the language, some holding that it was Koreanic, others that it was Japonic, and others that it was somehow intermediate between the three families.[18][28][4]
Other authors point out that most of the place names come from central Korea, an area captured by Goguryeo from Baekje and other states in the 5th century, and none from the historical homeland of Goguryeo north of the Taedong River.[4] These authors suggest that the place names reflect the languages of those states rather than that of Goguryeo.[4][33] This would explain why they seem to reflect multiple language groups.[12] It is generally agreed that these glosses demonstrate that Japonic languages were once spoken in part of the Korean peninsula, but there is no consensus on the identity of the speakers.[18]
A small number of inscriptions have been found in Goguryeo, the earliest being the Gwanggaeto Stele (erected in Ji'an in 414). All are written in Classical Chinese, but feature some irregularities, including occasional use of object–verb order (as found in Korean and other northeast Asian languages) instead of the usual Chinese verb–object order, and particles 之 and 伊, for which some authors have proposed Korean interpretations.[34][35] Alexander Vovin argues that the Goguryeo language was the ancestor of Koreanic, citing a few Goguryeo words in Chinese texts such as the Book of Wei (6th century) that appear to have Korean etymologies, as well as Koreanic loanwords in Jurchen and Manchu.[26]
The Book of Liang (635) states that the language of Baekje was the same as that of Goguryeo.[4] According to Korean traditional history, the kingdom of Baekje was founded by immigrants from Goguryeo who took over Mahan.[3] The Japanese history Nihon Shoki, compiled in the early 8th century from earlier documents, including some from Baekje, records 42 Baekje words. These are transcribed as Old Japanese syllables, which are restricted to the form (C)V, limiting the precision of the transcription. About half of them appear to be Koreanic.[36] Based on these words and a passage in the Book of Zhou (636), Kōno Rokurō argued that the kingdom of Baekje was bilingual, with the gentry speaking a Puyŏ language and the common people a Han language.[34][37]
- ↑ The title refers to the Chinese Three Kingdoms period (220–280 AD), not the Three Kingdoms of Korea (4th to 7th centuries).
- ↑ The name Han (韓) is unrelated to the Chinese Han dynasty, but is analysed as Korean ha 'great' with the nominalizer suffix -n, meaning 'chieftain'.[25]
- ↑ Traditional histories give founding dates for Baekje and Silla of 18 BC and 57 BC respectively, and these dates are repeated in textbooks, but archaeological and documentary evidence indicates that these kingdoms were founded in the 4th century.[30]
- ↑ а б в г Campbell та Poser, (2008).
- ↑ а б Tranter, (2012).
- ↑ а б в г д е ж и к Sohn, (1999).
- ↑ а б в г д е ж и к л м н п р с т у ф х ц ш щ ю я Lee та Ramsey, (2011).
- ↑ а б Kim, (1983).
- ↑ а б в Lee та Ramsey, (2000).
- ↑ а б Yi, (2014).
- ↑ а б в Kim, (1987).
- ↑ Park та Wee, (2016).
- ↑ а б в Nelson, (1995).
- ↑ а б в Pai, (2000).
- ↑ а б в г Whitman, (2013).
- ↑ Janhunen та Kho, (1982).
- ↑ Cho та Whitman, (2020).
- ↑ Whitman, (2012).
- ↑ а б Vovin, (2017).
- ↑ Janhunen, (1996).
- ↑ а б в г Whitman, (2011).
- ↑ а б в Vovin, (2010).
- ↑ а б Janhunen, (1999).
- ↑ Serafim, (2008).
- ↑ Shin, (2014).
- ↑ а б в г д е Seth, (2024).
- ↑ а б Byington та Barnes, (2014).
- ↑ Nam, (2012), с. 55.
- ↑ а б Vovin, (2013a).
- ↑ Unger, (2009).
- ↑ а б Beckwith, (2004).
- ↑ Georg, (2017).
- ↑ Seth, (2024), с. 27.
- ↑ Whitman, (2015).
- ↑ Itabashi, (2003).
- ↑ Toh, (2005).
- ↑ а б Vovin, (2005).
- ↑ Nam, (2012).
- ↑ Bentley, (2000).
- ↑ Kōno, (1987).